. >> tote trial -- back to the trial, there is op-ed in "new york post," michael goodwin that reads in part: >> i -- we're talking about contrast, looking at "new york times." will a mountain of evidence be enough to convict trump, the sub headline. monday we'll see opening statements. state's case seems strong but a convection is far from assured. if you read to that article there is a lot about the heavy left, challenges that prosecution has in making the witnesses seem credible. >> yeah, and they write the headline, they can't support it in the story or the facts, there are two verdicts here, i have read michael goodwin for years, he is pretty measured and leveled. there is you public verdict, they are the people going to the polls. this is an attempt to make a federal charge that was projected by the federal agency, federal election commission into a state level change, and americans get that. the public verdict, i think will be more dodgerring. -- more damaging, while in new york, trump should barnstorm new york city, he was new york city before anyone, alvin braggs or pa this is